Thank you for your interest in this study!

EdSource and its funders like to know who our work reaches and how it might be used. Please take a moment to answer the questions below before you download the study documents.

Please answer all required questions.

We hope you will fill out this survey for us, but if you don't have time now, just click .

1. How did you hear about this study?

2. What prompted your interest in this study?

2. In what state are you primarily located?

3. What is your primary role?

Teacher... Administrator... Other...
 
 
   
   
   

5. Please tell us who you are. (optional)

Name Title Organization

6. Would you like to receive EdSource's occasional email bulletins? If so, please enter your email below: (optional)

Email Address
   

If you encounter problems submitting this survey, please email us or call: (650) 917-9481

Sign up for email bulletins


Follow Us

Follow EdSource on Twitter Follow EdSource on Facebook

School Accountability Under NCLB: Ambitious Goals and Competing Systems

August 2005

16 pages

PDF Download Free Download

California’s schools are held accountable under two, currently mismatched, accountability systems—state and federal. Each is evolving, with much debate and negotiation. Meanwhile, because the two systems use different metrics, a school can do well on one and not the other, creating much public confusion.

As state and federal officials work on proposals to unify the two systems, this report offers needed background, an update, and key long-term considerations. Specifically, it describes the proposal that the California Department of Education has developed to adapt its system to satisfy expectations under the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB); provides context for understanding that proposal by summarizing the similarities and differences between the state and federal systems; highlights key issues in California and elsewhere in the country; and describes likely next steps.

EdSource thanks The Noyce Foundation for underwriting the research and development of this publication.