Thank you for your interest in this study!

EdSource and its funders like to know who our work reaches and how it might be used. Please take a moment to answer the questions below before you download the study documents.

Please answer all required questions.

We hope you will fill out this survey for us, but if you don't have time now, just click .

1. How did you hear about this study?

2. What prompted your interest in this study?

2. In what state are you primarily located?

3. What is your primary role?

Teacher... Administrator... Other...
 
 
   
   
   

5. Please tell us who you are. (optional)

Name Title Organization

6. Would you like to receive EdSource's occasional email bulletins? If so, please enter your email below: (optional)

Email Address
   

If you encounter problems submitting this survey, please email us or call: (650) 917-9481

Sign up for email bulletins

Similar Students, Different Results: Why Do Some Schools Do Better?

June 2006

20 pages

Free download

PDF Download Free Download Receive by Mail $6 x (Qty) Add to Cart (Print)

EdSource Summary Report

Some people say that you can predict the performance of a California school based on its zip code. It is true that parent education and socioeconomic level—and a student’s proficiency in English—are important to students’ academic success. But school and district practices and policies contribute as well.

Among schools that serve roughly the same kinds of students in California, a large and consistent gap in academic performance exists. This gap can be as much as 250 points on the 200-to-1000 scale of the Academic Performance Index (API), the state’s primary accountability measure. That observation prompted a two-year collaborative research project overseen by EdSource.

The research study looked at factors that might explain that gap in API scores, focusing on a subset of California elementary schools serving largely low-income students. The goal was to determine which current K–5 practices and policies are most strongly associated with the higher levels of student performance some schools achieve. The original report was followed by a look at specific findings related to schools' reading curriculum.

This 20-page EdSource lay report summarizes all the Similar Students, Different Results study's findings, up through the spring of 2006. This document is written with K-12 practitioners, community leaders, and state policymakers in mind

For more information on this study, and a comprehensive set of related materials, please see the full technical report.

EdSource thanks Reed Hastings for posing an important research question and then providing the financial support that allowed the research team to conduct this independent study to find some answers.