For the first time, graduating seniors from around California – more than 10,000 – have been awarded a state “seal” indicating their proficiency in two languages.
The award, which consists of a gold seal affixed to a student’s high school diploma, is the result of legislation (AB 815) authored by Assemblymember Julia Brownley (D-Santa Monica) and signed into law by Gov. Jerry Brown last year.
Some 59 districts around the state were already awarding their own seal of biliteracy, but this is the first time that it has been done statewide.
Not surprisingly, the vast majority – 70 percent – of those earning the seal demonstrated proficiency in Spanish, followed by French (10 percent) and Mandarin (7 percent). Some 2 percent of students were proficient in Japanese, with a similar percentage in Cantonese and German. Altogether, students with proficiency in 40 different languages, including American sign language, were awarded the seal.
The California Department of Education could not provide a breakdown as to what proportion of those receiving the seal were native English speakers.
Shelly Spiegel-Coleman, executive director of Californians Together, which advocated on behalf of the seal for many years, earlier told EdSource that the seal was not intended to be a rebuff to Proposition 227, the 1998 initiative effectively banning bilingual education in California. Rather, she said, it is a way to ”take a fresh look at the benefits of students being equipped in multiple languages.”
Related Posts
- Bilingualism to be encouraged through “State Seal of Biliteracy”
- AP results indicate impressive gains for state’s top students
- Districts to pay teachers based in part on their students’ test scores
- Better choice of courses for serious community college students
Filed under: Featured, Languages, Quick Hits
Comment Policy
EdSource encourages a robust debate on education issues and welcomes comments from our readers. The level of thoughtfulness of our community of readers is rare among online news sites. To preserve a civil dialogue, writers should avoid personal, gratuitous attacks and invective. Comments should be relevant to the subject of the article responded to. EdSource retains the right not to publish inappropriate and non-germaine comments.
EdSource encourages commenters to use their real names. Commenters who do decide to use a pseudonym should use it consistently.