Fresno Unified and Sacramento City Unified are among the five districts nationwide highlighted by the Education Trust for creating environments in high-poverty schools where teachers can thrive and stay. The report – “Building and Sustaining Talent: Creating Conditions in High-Poverty Schools That Support Effective Teaching and Learning” – found common themes behind their success: “a focus on strong leadership, a campus-wide commitment to improving instruction by analyzing student data and reflecting on practice, and a collaborative environment that values and rewards individual contribution.”
Fresno Unified was praised for its Skillful Leader Project, an effort to better train principals and create a pipeline for future school administrators, which Superintendent Michael Hanson started in 2006. Hanson had found a lack of consistency in how principals evaluated and supported teachers across California’s fourth-largest district. Winning the confidence of teachers in their principals was key, the district found, to encouraging them to work openly and collaboratively.
Sac City Unified was cited for its Priority Schools, Superintendent Jonathan Raymond’s initiative, now heading into its third year, to focus attention on a half-dozen low-performing schools. In enticing strong leaders to transfer to the schools, the district gave them more autonomy in hiring teachers, extra resources, and instructional coaches. Teachers received extra training in using data to analyze student work.
The district exempted staff in the schools from layoffs by seniority – a move that the Sacramento Teachers Association has challenged in court.
Filed under: Featured, Quick Hits, Teacher Collaboration, Teachers · Tags: Education Trust-, Fresno Unified, Jonathan Raymond, Michael Hanson, Sacramento City Unified School District
Comment Policy
EdSource encourages a robust debate on education issues and welcomes comments from our readers. The level of thoughtfulness of our community of readers is rare among online news sites. To preserve a civil dialogue, writers should avoid personal, gratuitous attacks and invective. Comments should be relevant to the subject of the article responded to. EdSource retains the right not to publish inappropriate and non-germaine comments.
EdSource encourages commenters to use their real names. Commenters who do decide to use a pseudonym should use it consistently.